Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Body Shot


Today's column for the Daily Banter treads familiar ground for me lately in that it deals with Lena Dunham. It also treads familiar ground in general right now in that it deals with Dunham's incessant nudity, a popular topic of conversation at the moment among journalists. Where it treads new ground is that it's probably going to get me called a misogynist prick.

Anyway, sharpen your knives and take a look.

Here's the opening shot:

"Here’s a little something I don’t think I’ve ever actually told anyone: Andrew Breitbart wrote to me not once but twice. Back in February of 2010 he rattled off a very strange late-night rant at me in response to something I’d written about his little Renfield, James O’Keefe. It was full of misspelled words and ended with a reference to Footloose, and it wound up getting quite a bit of press for my little corner of the internet given that it provided a flawless example of Breitbart’s pettiness when it came to taking on anyone at all who dared to write something about him and his acolytes that he didn’t consider properly hagiographic.

But a couple of weeks after that first e-mail I got another, this one reacting to a quickie diatribe I’d posted on my site that more met with Breitbart’s approval. The piece in question furiously questioned the sincerity of Hollywood’s decision to wrap its toned arms around Gabourey Sidibe and Mo’Nique, who at the time were riding a wave of critical praise for their performance in Precious, and declare them physically beautiful."


Read the Rest Here

Friday, September 14, 2012

Royal-Ts


Today's quickie column for the Daily Banter tackles the very important subject of Kate Middleton's breasts.

Here's the opening shot:

"A quick word or two about the topless pictures of Kate Middleton now circulating online and the royal family’s response to them. So what? First of all, the idea that a French magazine — a French magazine — would get all 'mon dieu!' and pretend that it’s a big deal that somebody is half-naked out in the open is practically a comedy bit. We’re the ones who are puritanical idiots; one of the now wealthiest and most famous women in the world sunning herself topless while on vacation in Provence shouldn’t surprise anyone, least of all the Europeans. "

Read the Rest Here

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Quote of the Day


"There's more in the message here with the presence of the camera, the obvious come hither posture and the aroused breasts and all the sexual components. The statue is sending a message to children."

-- Phillip Cosby, head of the American Family Association chapter covering Overland Park, Kansas, which is attempting to have that city's top officials indicted over their decision to allow an art exhibit by Chinese sculptors which features a statue of a nude woman to be displayed publicly

The statue in question is pictured at left. And yes, you read that right: The AFA wants to have city officials indicted on criminal charges, saying that by authorizing the exhibit, they're encouraging sexting among kids.

I've gone back and read the above quote several times now and I honestly chuckle a little out loud each time, particularly when I get to the words "aroused breasts." First of all, I get the feeling that this statue is pretty much the only place a guy like Phillip Cosby has seen aroused breasts in years, and second -- how utterly fucking terrified of sex are conservatives?

Monday, April 30, 2012

Quote of the Day


"Sexual conduct encouraging an individual to engage in a non-abstinent behavior."

-- The definition of "Gateway Sexual Activity," according to a bill passed by lawmakers in Tennessee last week intended to promote abstinence-only sex ed in schools and to prohibit teachers from promoting actions that could conceivably lead to sex

The more I read about laugh-out-loud shit like this, the more I think that the push for absolute abstinence came along about two generations too late in places like Tennessee.

Also, this:

Saturday, February 18, 2012

The Gulp of Mexico


My favorite detail of this completely unsurprising story: There's a dating website called "gay.com."

Why oh why didn't I buy up that domain name about 20 years ago?

Talking Points Memo: Anti-Immigration Arizona Sheriff Rocked by Allegations of Immigrant Ex-Boyfriend/2.18.12

Friday, December 2, 2011

Quote of the Day


"Maybe I live in a different New York than this movie is set in, but are there really that many beautiful, nicely dressed, apparently sane women willing to risk their lives by going home with a random dude from the subway, even if he does look like Michael Fassbender?"

-- Dana Stevens, in a review for Shame at Slate

In a word: yes.

I've told this story many times, usually to single people thinking about moving to New York, but never here: CNN had sent a young male producer prospect up from Atlanta and Ali Velshi was showing him around the offices at the Time Warner Center one morning when apparently the subject of the single life in the big city came up between the two of them. I didn't catch the whole conversation, only a little bit of it as I happened to be walking by on my way to something else.

I saw Velshi lean in conspiratorially, saw the young guy give a little knowing laugh, then Velshi turned to me and shot off a quick, "Chez -- dating in New York City."

"Fish in a barrel," I responded with a smile as I breezed swiftly past them, not even breaking stride.

There are both wonderful and horrifying reasons that I know this.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Plumbing Attractions


If you ever wondered how uncomfortable it would be watching a group of pseudo-intellectual New York City feminists -- and no doubt in the interest of political correctness, atypically uptight gay men -- try to prove that they really like sex too, wonder no more. I give you Salon's "Sexiest Men of 2011" list.

It's a who's-who of people you've likely never heard of and certainly wouldn't stay up at night fantasizing about with that "rabbit" thing you bought online -- the kind of men who you just know were pitched as being able to "excite the most erotic organ in a woman's body: her mind." Included: Margin Call director J.C. Chandor, hipster god Justin Vernon (aka Bon Iver), personality-less emaciated celebrity chef Marcus Samuelsson, Marc Fucking Maron, Thom Yorke (who's admittedly brilliant but whom I'd only describe as sexy to those with an odd Martin Short fetish), Staten Island choir-leader Gregg Breinberg (feel free to take a minute), and my personal favorites: Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer. If the names escape you, that's because you were too busy seeing the latest jejune Bradley Cooper movie instead of watching the news like you should've been when the two hikers were released from an Iranian jail earlier this year. Apparently nothing impresses the women of the Salon staff like really bad ideas and sodomy.

Anyway, take a peek. It'll make you glad you're average.

And sorry, Mary Beth. I love you.

Salon: Salon's Sexiest Men of 2011/11.17.11

Thursday, November 3, 2011

The Ladykiller


Finally, something we Americans can understand: a good, old-fashioned sex scandal. None of that exhaustingly complex financial lingo to comprehend; no "credit default swaps" or "CDOs" to try to wrap your brain around. No elaborate timelines or spiderwebs of interconnected parties at various levels of government and business to follow. No globe-decimating repercussions that reach down into the lives of each and every one of us. Just one boorish guy accused of possibly trying to sleep with a bunch of women who weren't his wife. It's titillating, easy to understand, and generally the way things ought to be -- what the American mind at the beginning of the 21st century was made for.

I've been reluctant to even get into the sexual harassment scandal currently sucking Herman Cain up into its vortex for a number of reasons, the most obvious being that it doesn't matter one bit -- the scandal, I mean. Yesterday a GOP operative and former National Restaurant Association worker said he personally witnessed Cain harassing a woman during the latter's time as head of the NRA and that if the details of that encounter came out, it would spell "the end Cain's campaign." Except that Cain's campaign doesn't need a crude interaction with a woman -- or even three, as has been accused -- to spell the end of his campaign. The damn thing was over about three seconds after the words "I'm running for president" came tumbling out of Cain's big, undisciplined mouth. While Vanity Fair calls Cain's instantly doomed run a "tiresome national distraction," I'll be a little more characteristically blunt: Scarlett Johansson will sit on my face and piss morphine into my mouth before Herman Cain becomes the Republican nominee for President of the United States. It's never gonna happen. Period.

A better story, of course, is how quickly and viciously the candidates who make up the GOP 2012 Presidential Candidate Clown Car continued their proud tradition of immediately turning on each other once Cain wound up in the media crosshairs. Cain's camp, led by cigarette-smoking weirdo Mark Block, quickly faulted floundering drunk Rick Perry for leaking the story to the press, continuing another proud tradition in Republican politics: blaming the person who ostensibly rats out the bad behavior rather than the one who actually engages in it. Whether the Perry camp really did have anything to do with the media getting hold of the story, who knows, and again it hardly matters. Since day one Cain has been his own worst enemy -- a walking punchline -- and his fade-back-into-obscurity or embarrassing public implosion was always just a matter of time.

There is, however, one genuinely fascinating aspect to this whole scandal -- and that's the predictable left-versus-right reaction to it. If you figured the whole debate over what constitutes sexual harassment -- in all of its uncomfortable detail -- had been mercifully killed off and buried in the immediate wake of the Clarence Thomas saga, its zombiefied remains crawled out of the grave just in time for Halloween. And apparently when it comes to sexual politics not a damn thing has changed in twenty years. The right still believes that women in the workplace, by and large, need to grow thicker skin, and the left still thinks that it's entirely the prerogative of the person claiming harassment to decide what exactly constitutes that harassment. As usual, the realistic approach is somewhere between the two ends.

Only a Neanderthal would think that sexually harassing a peer or subordinate in the workplace is acceptable, but the nebulous nature of sexual harassment can easily get a well-intentioned schlub inadvertently lumped in with the obnoxious overgrown frat-boy set. I get that this is why so many working environments have adopted draconian policies against sexually suggestive talk of any kind, but let's be honest: How many offices really exist in some kind of politically correct Utopian bubble where nobody ever makes an offhand comment, questionable joke or ill-advised advance? We're people, not robots -- each of us is different and looks at the world in a unique way, and when you get a bunch of us together there's going to be tension, no matter what safeguards are put in place in the futile hope of making all of us equals (the great irony to our claims of valuing a diverse workforce, by the way). What's perfectly acceptable to one person is entirely offensive to someone else.

Where the usual suspects on the right are correct in their indignation is when they argue that it's wrong to turn workplaces into witch hunts every time some poor jackass makes a comment that his or her coworker finds objectionable. Harassment is actually in the eye of the beholder, and there's not a damn thing wrong with recognizing the potential predicament that can lead to. You're not a Philistine for admitting that each person will likely see an undefined issue differently. Likewise, no one should lose his or her job for saying something intended innocently but interpreted offensively; that intent should actually be taken into consideration. Again, where the Laura Ingrahams of the world, as generally abhorrent as they are, are right on this is when they say that a woman who's on the receiving end of an unwanted comment or advance shouldn't make immediately reporting the dingbat behind it a matter of policy. Yes, if somebody says something to you that pisses you off, you should actually let that person know what he's done before running and trying to get him officially disciplined. He does it again, he's been warned -- and all bets are off.

Where the talking heads on the left are correct in this whole debate is when they say that a system has to be in place designed to protect women in particular from serial leches. The arrogant assholes who regularly use their authority to try to pressure their peers and underlings into compromising positions and who believe that they can do so with impunity. If the reports about him turn out to be true, that's exactly the group Herman Cain will seem to fall into. He won't be some average doof who's made an untoward but relatively harmless comment to a coworker over the copier; he'll be an incorrigible lothario who thinks his position of power grants him the right to try to bed anyone he chooses and, seemingly, to shame them if they refuse him and then fight back. It'll make him a despicable piece of shit.

And it'll mean that he'll never be President of the United States.

But he was never going to be anyway.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Picture(s) of the Day



The first photo should've been the cover of Newsweek, since it constitutes genuine news. The second one -- well, let's just say that's some serious acting there.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Color-Loaded



It's rare that I provide any disclaimers around here, but this is absolutely NSFW. It is, however, the funniest thing you'll see all day.

Watch it now before the C&D order arrives from Wrigley's team of lawyers.

And careful. I hear those things burn when they get in your eye.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Movin' Out (Anthony's Song)


So Weiner's out.

That's okay, give it a year or so and he'll realize that that light at the end of the tunnel was always from the cable TV studio where he'll be hosting his own show.

By the way, I stand by my statement that he could've ridden out this scandal if he'd wanted to. If he had truly dug his heels in there likely wouldn't have been much anyone could do to break him loose, and eventually the press, his congressional counterparts and America itself would've just said screw it and moved on to something else.

That said, resigning was probably the right thing to do.

Friday, June 10, 2011

Quote of the Day


"I think it's unlikely that Mrs. Weiner doesn't give a shit, for the record, but there are wives out there who don't give a shit about their husband's online activities—as well as wives who engage in online sexting, texting, flirting, and Tweeting themselves. And one day a sex scandal is going to break and instead of playing the stoic victim, a la Mrs. Vitter and Mrs. Spitzer and Mrs. Clinton, the wife is going to join her 'disgraced' husband at the press conference and they're going to announce that they have an open relationship. And Megan's head will explode."

-- Columnist Dan Savage, lambasting Megan McArdle and pundits like her who deign to speak for and express convenient solidarity with Anthony Weiner's wife, Huma Abedin

Monday, June 6, 2011

Quote of the Week (Obviously)


"To be clear, the picture was of me, and I sent it."

-- Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York

As someone posted on Twitter not long ago, Weiner's startlingly candid and long-winded news conference that just mercifully wrapped up was the kind of thing we usually see in movies -- not in real life.

And as somebody else posted on Twitter, Weiner saying, "I apologize to Andrew Breitbart" is going to be Breitbart's ringtone for the next couple of years. Obviously it's unfortunate to have to admit that Breitbart -- who, make no mistake, remains an unscrupulous turd -- got this one right, simply because it gives him back a shred of credibility in these kinds of matters from here on out that I'm still not sure he really deserves. My argument about Breitbart will remain that even if he hadn't received confirmation that what happened actually happened -- as well as a public confession from Weiner -- it wouldn't have stopped him from at least partially pushing the story. But for now, there's no way around the fact that Breitbart uncovered what he essentially said he uncovered. It doesn't make James O'Keefe or Shirley Sherrod go away -- but he wins this round and gets to claim vindication.

What remains, then, is whether or not the public believes that what's been admitted to is worth calling for Weiner's head. (I really can't believe I just stooped to that.) I stand by my statement last week that I don't care one bit what Anthony Weiner does in his private life and his sexual proclivities are his own. He posted pictures of his penis on Twitter? That makes him, admittedly, really stupid. He sent them to younger women? Well, who the hell would you think he'd be sending them to? He didn't break the law, though, and his being exposed as a bit of a freak doesn't also expose him as a hypocrite, considering that he's never been one of those guys professionally staking out the hyper-religious moral high ground, preaching chastity or purity or whatever-the-hell as policy or in his personal life.

For the record, I really am tired of public "sex scandals" -- particularly ones where there was nothing unlawful involved -- further diminishing our cultural discourse in this country and distracting the already easily distracted and titillated dingbats in the mainstream political press. And I can't stress intensely enough how this belief is in no way a sudden reaction to the fact that I happen to like Anthony Weiner. Yes, the occasionally sordid sexual escapades of our elected officials are a breeze to point and laugh at, but reacting with shock to the notion that somebody is capable of infidelity or enjoys, quite frankly, getting laid as often and as creatively as possible is just laughably puritanical. People fuck. It's what we do. As I've said before, practically as a career lately, we're human and human beings are inherently flawed creatures; looking for reasons as to why people in the position to cheat actually do cheat is a fool's errand. And the more power someone has, the more likely he or she is to use that power to get laid. Jesus, you think nebbishy Anthony Weiner -- who probably got his ass kicked all over his Brooklyn elementary school playground growing up -- wasn't thinking the entire time he was coming up in politics and apparently whaling on his pecs, "I'm so gonna finally get me the college pussy that was denied to me in college"? Make no mistake: If a 25-year-old is what he really wanted out of life, he probably shouldn't have gotten married and tried to settle down as a family man, and what he's now done to his wife and family is unconscionable. But to be shocked, exactly, that he let his dick get him into trouble? You're kidding me, right? Cue the cut to a caveman sitting on a rock somewhere saying, "Ugh, me know what it like, man," as a woman hits him over the head with a club while pointing at naked drawings of him on some other woman's cave wall.

By the way, my favorite tweeted response to today's Weiner newser comes from Anthony Cumia of the Opie and Anthony show:

"I love having a job where I can send dick pics with impunity."

Amen to that.

Adding: The column this is from is actually a couple of days old but leave it to Taibbi to hit Weiner's stupidity with just the appropriate amount of blunt force:

"The truth is, if you're worth the congressional office at all, your automatic answer to any question about pictures like that has to be, 'No, that can't be me in that picture, because I'm a United States Congressman and I don't take digital pictures of my hard-ons."

I don’t want to gloat too much about Weiner. Milligan is right, it’s not like the guy is a serial killer. But as the Monday Night Football crew would say, C’mon, Man! If you want to be a national political figure, run for high office, and also have a family at the same time, you can’t be playing Russian roulette with your wife’s reputation every time you log on to your basement computer.

In other words, when you’re a certain kind of famous, there are a few things you’ve just got to give up in life –- like uploading pictures of your dick, for instance, or tweet-herding hot twentysomething women by the hundreds. Is it really that hard to find other hobbies?"

Friday, March 4, 2011

Bush Inauguration


Yes, I'm going to link to Bree Olson's (supposed) last nude pictorial ever, taken just a couple of weeks ago. But I'm not doing it to be prurient, I swear. I'm doing it because between Sasha Grey's recent surprise and now this shoot, I think it's safe to say that the era of bare-down-there may be ending.

Discuss.

Egotastic: Bree Olson's Last Adult Photo Shoot/3.3.11

Monday, October 25, 2010

Quote of the Day


"P-E-T-S... PETS! PETS! PETS!"

-- Jim Norton of The Opie and Anthony Show on the mugshot photo of a Long Island man arrested for allegedly molesting a dog, in which he appears to be wearing a New York Jets jersey

Various reports indicate that Mitchell Marsicano performed oral sex on the two-year-old Shiba Inu. The dog's name, by the way: Snowball.

I love it when I don't even have to try.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Bonus Quote of the Day


"She likes to surprise me by jumping on top of me and fucking me when I'm not expecting it. It's a very Clouseau-Cato sexual relationship."

-- Votar

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Rated U.


I'm not even going to bother getting into this right now -- not after spending most of the past night wading knee-deep into the last nationally publicized case involving college kids, sex, the internet and an appalling invasion of privacy. With that in mind, suffice it to say that I rest my case.

CBS News: Karen Owen's PowerPoint Sex "Thesis": Is Privacy Dead?/10.7.10

And to those who find this dumbshit's actions acceptable, or worse, some kind of Sex and The City, Cake Party-style flag of progress planted in the name of female liberation -- congratulations, ladies, you've officially proven that you can be just as crude, shallow, irresponsible, sexually capricious, and flat out fucking stupid as men. Terrific -- you've arrived. Hope it feels good.

Lots of winners all the way around in this story.

The Huffington Post: Karen Owen's Duke Sex-Rating PowerPoint Presentation Goes Viral/10.7.10

Jezebel: College Girl's PowerPoint "Fuck List" Goes Viral/9.30.10

In addition, can somebody please burn Duke to the ground?

Monday, January 11, 2010

Picture of the Week


Workers lift "Roxxxy," supposedly the world's first sex robot, into position at the Adult Entertainment Expo in Vegas. Created by a company in New Jersey (look for her next season on Jersey Shore where she'll pull a Terminator on anybody who dares to try punching her), Roxxxy is programmed not just for "sexual intimacy" but for actual conversation. All this does is prove that her designers seriously overestimated the importance men place on actually talking to the women they screw.

Either way, this picture gives new meaning to the term "Uncanny Valley."

Votar, your new wife awaits.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Tuesday is Recycling Day


Last week, I posted a rambling, incoherent, borderline-lunatic quote from Victoria Jackson -- former Saturday Night Live cast-member turned bullhorn for the religious right. I also mentioned that her upbringing included a stint at Dade Christian School in Miami, a place I was lucky enough to attend for about six months when I was 13-years-old. (I say "lucky" because those six months provided me with more great stories than just about the entire rest of my childhood.) Over the course of this site, I've brought up my time at DCS on more than one occasion, and this morning I'm republishing a few of the best pieces dealing with Miami's only high school that also doubles as an insane asylum. Call it "The Dade Christian Chronicles."


"The Second Coming... and the Third, and the Fourth, Etc." (Originally Published, 7.8.08)

In the 8th grade, I briefly --very briefly -- attended a Southern Baptist school.

To call the entire experience harrowingly surreal would be an insult to the collected works of Dali and Argento. The reality was that life at Dade Christian was, and I'd imagine still is, a little like being held in a prison camp somewhere in Stepford enemy territory. It was generally almost impossible to tell which of the kids had truly succumbed and accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior and were therefore willing vessels of the daily onslaught of superstitious nonsense being heaped on them by the school's silver-haired pastor -- a man straight out of Central Casting -- and which were just faking it out of fear that, if exposed, they'd be the targets of a point-and-screech mob scene, a la Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

It goes without saying that every class taught at Dade Christian was, in one way or another, a Bible class. There wasn't a scholarly subject or topic of debate that couldn't be improved upon by filtering it through a 2000 year old text written by people who literally knew nothing about anything. This, unfortunately, included sex education -- euphemistically rechristened "Human Development" and relegated to one or two class discussions helmed by a compact and balding, Phil Collinsy hyper-Southern Baptist named, amusingly, Bobby Winkler.

Winkler was a walking cliché -- the kind of guy who seemed to always be "on," as if he were acting for the invisible cameras of a Christian-themed reality TV show. He wanted to make sure that the kids in his care never doubted that the knowledge of an eventual ticket to heaven meant a life of 24/7 exuberance, and he went about it by rarely turning the "frenzy" setting below a flat nine. Any conversation with Winkler left you overwhelmed and in need of a nap.

One Friday afternoon, during his usual end-of-the-week "Ask a Bible Teacher Anything" segment, Winkler got hit with a question about the seemingly taboo topic of pre-marital sex. It's the sort of thing you would've expected to come from a class full of kids coping with a lot of nascent horniness, the kind that even Jesus couldn't help them stave off. One 13-year-old boy, a classmate of mine, asked Winkler what was so wrong with masturbation and sex in general -- why God had gone through all that effort to create it, only to turn around and declare it verbotten. (Obviously, the kid could've substituted just about any "sin" in place of sex and the argument would've worked just as well.)

Winkler's response to this perfectly legitimate question was to stand silently for a moment, seemingly taken aback, then ask the class in his booming southern drawl if it could answer the question of "why God doesn't want you to play with yourself."

The kid who asked the question, sufficiently shamed to the point of immediately trying to fashion a noose out of his shoelaces, shrunk into his seat and didn't speak up in class again -- ever again. Still, Winkler I guess figured he might as well attempt to clarify for his charges just what Jesus's specific rules were when it came to the pleasures of the flesh. He stalked back and forth in front of the blackboard, prattling off the usual "sex is between a married man and woman in the eyes of God" spiel, the sweat glistening on his abundant forehead like the AC had died and it wasn't a brisk 60 degrees in his classroom. This line of religio-blather continued for several minutes -- Winkler laying out (no pun intended) the standard Baptist arguments against pre-marital contact of any kind -- before the Bible teacher suddenly stopped cold, turned to face the class and said something that made pure liquid nitrogen run down my spine, even at the age of 13.

He looked at us -- his eyes scanning the class one face at a time -- gave us a frightening grin that can't be described as anything other than, ironically, devilish, and said quietly, "But let me tell you what happens when you get married. Once you're married -- you can do anything you want to your wife."

I bring this story up to show that the entire idea of sex and Christian Conservatism has always made me more than a little queasy. The two notions -- whether the former is of the married variety or not -- just seem completely incongruous. And yet something strange seems to be happening these days: Christian Conservatives, as they do with so many other subjects, are usurping and dominating the debate over sex by adopting an attitude that they can lay (once again, no pun intended) claim not only to sex but to better sex. As if Jesus makes them come harder than the rest of us, maybe as a little something to tide them over until the real rapture shows up and brings them all that eternal bliss.

The God folks arrogantly dictating the parameters of the discussion on sex in our society -- and everyone else willingly ceding the floor to them -- is a bad idea all the way around. People who've only experienced sex, ostensibly, with one person claiming to be experts on the subject is a laughable conceit.

Although not a surprising one, if Bobby Winkler and his implied proclivities are any indication.

God help his wife.

Read on:

(Salon.com: Jesus Loves You -- and Your Orgasm)


"And By the Way, If You See Your Mom this Weekend, Would You Be Sure and Tell Her, 'SATAN! SATAN! SATAN!'" (Originally Published, 10.31.06)

I always found Halloween to be kind of a silly holiday. I certainly understand its pagan roots, but at this stage of civilization -- things being what they presently are and all -- I can't help but feel that the inflated emphasis on ghosts, witches, black cats and the like as objects of fear is, well, Rockwellian in its quaintness.

I mean, could any of Edgar Allen Poe's delusions -- even at its most brutally drug-induced -- have ever metastasized into something as perfectly evil as Dick Cheney?

Terrorists want to kill me; my President doesn't have a brain, yet still inexplicably walks, talks and smirks; his ostensible second-in-command is regularly seen growling, and shoots his elderly friends in the face; human viscera lines the streets of Iraq -- and you're telling me the ranch-style house up the street with a couple of tombstones in the front yard, a vegetable with a face carved in it, and the all-night Monsterfest on A&E is supposed to scare me?

Sure thing.

That said, I'll relay a truly terrifying tale from my short time at one of the most frightening places on Earth: Dade Christian School.

The God-fearing men and women who ran the place were -- and no doubt still are -- committed to making sure that all of their students have a Halloween that's happy, safe, and free of the torment of eternal damnation. That's why every year, the school has its own Halloween party in which each child is encouraged to dress as -- wait for it -- his or her favorite Bible character. Needless to say, this typically causes some confusion, seeing as how the whole beard and robes thing was pretty much the only look going back in the day.

Upon learning the theme of the traditional Dade Christian Halloween-Without-Hell Extravaganza, I of course began peppering the teacher with question after ridiculous question about what my costume could and couldn't entail:

Could I pour salt all over myself and be Lot's wife?

What about water? Would dousing myself in water help me to stand out as obviously being Noah?

Could I just come naked and be Adam?

If I dressed as Pharaoh, could I cast the entire school into bondage?

Isn't Satan technically a Bible character?

These annoyances continued until the teacher finally ended them in the usual way: by sending me to the Dean's office.

Surprisingly, he wasn't expecting to see my face again so soon -- being that a few days earlier, an angry and frustrated faculty chaperone had deemed that I be exiled to his office for reading the novelization of Halloween III: Season of the Witch during the entire bus ride to and from our class trip to Disney World.

You know something? Now that I think about it -- maybe dressing as a Christian really is the scariest costume imaginable.

Happy Halloween, kids -- and whatever you do, stay away from Old Man Cheney's house.


"Jesus Loves Me, This I Know, For My Parents Tell Me So" (Originally Published, 10.8.06)

There are times when living in this city isn't simply tolerable but downright wonderful. Yesterday, my wife and I spent the afternoon wandering through the labyrinthian Museum of Natural History -- taking in the myriad exhibits on the science of the universe and mankind's growth throughout the millennia. We followed this up with a walk through a street fair in the kind of crisp air which can only herald the dawn of autumn, then an evening at my agent's place on the Upper West Side, drinking wine on the terrace and watching twilight descend over the city in shades of blue and purple, providing a view which was beautifully augmented by the rise of a giant and glowing full moon.

This morning, I dragged myself out of bed, threw on a leather coat and wandered out onto a relatively quiet York Avenue to grab a cup of coffee and a few provisions for the refrigerator. Given that I had no intention of straying very far from my apartment, I neglected to bring along my iPod -- an accoutrement which is attached to my person with the regularity of a soldier's sidearm. The lack of Dave Brubeck pumping into my head (the perfect soundtrack to a Sunday morning in Manhattan, I believe) of course meant that my ears were open to the sounds of the city itself.

It meant that I was able to listen to and fully appreciate the conversations taking place outside of St. Monica's Catholic Church on East 79th Street.

On the steps of the church sat a mother and what I assume were her two young children; she was explaining to them Christ's inarguable plan for their lives. Not far away, I strode alongside a family which had apparently just exited Sunday mass; the children were, as children do, innocently questioning the dogma which the priest had just laid out for them in no uncertain terms. It made me smile and shake my head -- a somewhat ironic gesture for a somewhat ironic moment.

Here were a group of children, willing to no doubt thoroughly buy into the existence of Santa Claus, asking logical questions about a professed truth which even to their young minds seemed incomprehensible. Their parents' predictable response to this curiosity?

Just trust us; you have to believe because that's the way it is.

Suffice to say, it took me back.

As it's Sunday, perhaps a confession is in order: I was raised in a Christian household.

To many, this will come as absolutely no surprise; it takes a fierce knowledge of -- and an even fiercer indoctrination to -- a given belief to eventually wage war against its tenets in any meaningful way. At some point -- exactly when, I can't recall -- I made a personal decision that religion in general and Christianity in particular was nothing more than absurdist wishful thinking, and that in this day and age it's more likely to get you killed by those with equal but opposite views of the hereafter than it is to create a more ethical and moral Earth for the totality of mankind to reside upon.

Needless to say, a majority of America and the world disagrees with me -- which as far as I'm concerned in no way substantiates its opposing position. For some reason we've come to accept Validation Through Democracy: the idea that the larger the group to adhere to a belief, the more likely it is for that belief to be accurate. Obviously, this is nonsense; it's entirely possible for a very large group of people to believe something that is completely false. At the risk of proving Godwin's Law -- it's important to remember that Hitler once had the overwhelming support of his people.

Many of those who are true believers in the concept of religion, of course, are parents. It is also, of course, these parents who instill their religious beliefs in their children, essentially creating an inherited fear of God in the same way an inherited eye-color, acquiesence to the parents' ideas of right and wrong, and even the parents' political beliefs are passed along. The end result is that religion becomes simply another ill-fitting hand-me-down. As I witnessed first-hand on the street today, kids will believe whatever their parents tell them: Insist that they must be "saved" and accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior and it will take years for them to believe otherwise (that is, if they ever do -- as opposed to simply passing down to their own kids the beliefs they themselves never thought to question).

If you'd like a frightening example of the dangers of this kind of indoctrination, go see the new documentary Jesus Camp. True, the film highlights only the most fervent of Christian extremists, but make no mistake that the ambition of these extremists is to thoroughly claim the United States of America for Christ. They want nothing less than the dawn of a new theocracy, and -- to borrow a line from George Benson by way of Whitney Houston -- they believe the children are their future.

The film focuses on the "Kids on Fire" camp which is located (ironically) at Devil's Lake, North Dakota. While there, children are forcefully instructed how to become "Christian Warriors" -- the eventual frontline in the battle to win the hearts, minds and souls of America. It's essentially a Jedi camp for Fundamentalist Christians, with a rather unassuming pastor named Becky Fischer playing the part of Yoda. Some of the film's most trenchant images are of children -- most under the age of ten -- weeping openly, speaking in tongues, praying before a large cardboard stand-up of George W. Bush (an image, coincidentally, with roughly the same IQ as the real President Bush), and talking about their initial desire to be "saved" because, at the astute age of five, they realized that they simply needed something "more" in their lives.

It would all be hilarious, if it weren't so utterly disturbing.

Some have seen the movie and have called the tactics and methods used on these children nothing short of brainwashing; unfortunately, it's simply parents doing what many parents do -- passing their beliefs down to their children, and giving them no other real option. Kids generally want to please their parents during their formative years, so if, as a parent, you tell your kids that they should believe the sun revolves around the Earth -- or that they need to be saved by Jesus Christ -- you can be all but assured that that's exactly what they'll do.

Understand, neither Pastor Becky Fischer nor the mothers and fathers who send their children to Camp Kids on Fire care one bit about my opinions or beliefs. To them, I'm to be at the very least pitied for what will surely be an eternity in hell -- or at most, despised for openly wishing to inflict my belief in logic and reason on the rest of the planet, which would inevitably turn it away from their "One True God."

This leads me to confession number two: For a very short time (not even a full year, for reasons which should be obvious) I went to a Fundamentalist Southern-Baptist school.

For the record, my parents sent me to Dade Christian School not because they were zealots or in fact subscribed at all to the school's extremist take on Christianity; I went there because it was right up the street from my home as a teenager and because it actually did offer an excellent education. Unfortunately, with that education came indoctrination. Dade Christian was -- and still is, unless raided by the ATF at some point -- the kind of school which force-fed students Evangelical dogma to the point of exerting a chilling level of control over not just their lives in school, but at home as well. Children weren't allowed to hold hands -- in school or out -- dance, attend rock concerts or generally do the things that normal kids often do. Important to mention at this point is the fact that the students who either truly believed the teachings of the school or simply hoped to ingratiate themselves with the teachers could be counted on to report the behavior of those kids who broke the rules outside of the school gates back to the almighty administration. Dade Christian School operated as if it were an occupied city -- complete with traitorous spies and a Vichy student government.

It goes without saying that I was less than popular with the occupying force, acting as the metaphorical insurgent who wandered the streets painting a giant red V over each Bible verse.

The clash of beliefs however reached critical mass in the wake of a tragedy.

A few years before enrolling at Dade Christian, I became friends with a young girl who lived up the street from me. Her name was Debby, and she and I would meet most afternoons to play kickball and generally get into trouble. We had both recently passed the point in life where boys and girls loathed each other, which meant that there was an odd but undeniable undertone of intimate curiosity to our relationship. We liked each other -- quite a bit in fact. We had the kind of relationship which was tinged with a level of youthful discovery that in retrospect brings a bittersweet smile to my face.

At some point however, it just stopped; she still lived up the street from me, but for a reason unknown to me at the time she simply seemed to disappear.

It was later, during my first day at Dade Christian, that I ran into Debby again. She was warm and kind to me, but strangely distant. I did my best to put it out of my head; I figured I would need all of my mental faculties to resist the school's relentless day-to-day prosyletism.

Debby and I never really talked again; we never got the chance to.

A few months after my encounter with her, there was a fire not far from my house. I awoke to the sound of firetrucks screaming past my window and quickly rushed outside to see what was going on -- running after the trucks until I saw what exactly had dragged them to my quiet neighborhood in the middle of the night.

Debby's home was on fire.

I stood silently, bathed in flashes of deep-red as the lights from the trucks created a chaos of long shadows and violent bursts of color. I watched Debby's mother -- whom I'd never actually spoken to -- cry loudly and collapse into a firefighter's arms. I never saw Debby come out; that's because she didn't.

I walked home numb -- a lack of feeling which lasted well into the next day at school. It was there, surrounded by tearful students and teachers, comforting each other with the knowledge that Debby was in a better place, that something overcame me. My numbness was replaced by something else: sheer fucking rage. I didn't doubt the honesty or sincerity of those who grieved at Dade Christian School, I did however doubt that they ever knew the Debby that I did. They never saw the truly beautiful young girl underneath the thick topcoat of artifice with which they had covered her through the perpetual insistence that there was something wrong with her -- that she needed to be "saved," and needed to denounce her humanity, herself. To those who truly believed the teachings I was inundated with daily, Debby was simply another lucky Christian soul gone to heaven.

My anger finally exploded just a few days later, during the memorial service held for my friend at the New Testament Baptist Church, which ran Dade Christian School. It was there that something so repugnant happened that I have no doubt of its impact on my view of religion since. During the service, the silver-haired pastor -- a man who looked as if he came right out of Central Casting -- stood on the stage and uttered these words:

"Perhaps something good can come from Debby's death. Perhaps it can teach you all that you can be taken from this world at any moment, and that you cannot take your immortal soul for granted. You have to accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior now, because there may not be a tomorrow."

He then urged those who were saved or wished to be to come up to the stage to bear witness for all of those in the crowd.

It was at that moment that I got up and walked out.

I was in the outer lobby of the church -- pacing and shaking with what I feared was an uncontrollable fury -- when one of my teachers, one I happened to like, came out to find me. She asked me if I was alright, and that was when I let everything inside me come bursting out.

I tried to keep my voice down, but I wound up seething and spitting anger through clenched teeth. I told her that what was going on just behind those double-doors was wrong. I told her that she couldn't possibly condone that kind of macabre exploitation of a student who sat in one of her classes just days ago. I told her that there was no reason for Debby's death, nor the death of any other kid -- and that justifying or rationalizing that kind of tragedy was simply outrageous. I told her she couldn't possibly believe in a god that would allow such groundless suffering. I told her the death of a young girl was just fucking wrong.

And then I cried.

Rather than defend the grotesque spectacle taking place just a few feet from us, the teacher simply nodded her head in acknowledgement.

But there were others who didn't. Who wouldn't. They were children -- like the baleful faces at Camp Kids on Fire -- who have been the targets of so much religious agitprop throughout their formative years, from parents who believe that they're doing God's will, that they truly believe that the death of one of their own would offer a silver-lining in the form of an object lesson from on high. At the risk of being too provocative, you have to ask yourself: If this kind of manipulation of children were coming from anyone but those who preach the dominion of Jesus, would we as a nation tolerate it?

Yesterday, my wife and I visited the Museum of Natural History. As we took in the exhibits on the earliest incarnation of the universe, the earliest incarnation of man, and the fossils which act as a concrete testament to the existence of dinosaurs -- it dawned on me that there are children in this country who believe none of it. They deny proven fact because their parents do. They've learned to demand nothing less than a new age of unreason.

Which is nothing compared to demanding that the death of one of them be accepted as the unquestionable work of a god who operates in ways we're not meant to understand.

The best we can hope for, is that they grow out of it.