Showing posts with label dick cheney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dick cheney. Show all posts

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Quote of the Day


"The idea that this can be written out of history, that it was on Cheney and Bush's watch that the biggest domestic attack of our lifetime happened and that somehow that's off the ledger -- we'll just begin the accounting on September 12th, 2011 -- It's so preposterous and it's amazing to me the extent to which in sort of normal public discourse they kind of get away with it."

-- Frank Rich on the Rachel Maddow Show last night, commenting on Dick Cheney's positively laughable criticism of the Obama Administration's performance during the Benghazi attack, which happened on September 11th of last year

Here was Cheney's exact quote, if you haven't seen it yet: "When we were there, on our watch, we were always ready on 9/11, on the anniversary."

For the record, when Cesca brought this up yesterday on the podcast, it was the only time I've ever expressed such utter, audible frustration that it actually made Bob laugh. It's fucking incomprehensible that, as Rich says, these idiots can continue to arrogantly strut and make the ludicrous claim that they "kept us safe" when the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history happened while they were in office. At the risk of violating Godwin's Law, by the logic they consistently use you could easily argue that Hitler was a pretty good guy to the Jews as long as you don't count that nasty Holocaust thing.

This isn't a matter of politics. This is objective fact and an insult to your, my, and all of our intelligence. The idea that we're expected to ignore the original 9/11 when we consider the Bush Administration's record of keeping Americans safe requires a kind of suspension of disbelief on our part -- and chutzpah on theirs -- that normal, non-sociopathic human beings are simply incapable of.

By the way, Maddow's entire takedown of the Republican conspiracy machine on her show last night was one for the ages.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Monday, October 3, 2011

Quote of the Day, Jr.


"I think it was a very good strike. I think it was justified, (but) I'm waiting for the administration to go back and correct something they said two years ago when they criticized us for 'overreacting' to the events of 9/11."

-- Dick Cheney, commenting on the killing of Anwar al-Aulaqi on CNN's State of the Union yesterday

You know what I think? I think it's freaking baffling that anyone -- certainly any responsible member of the American press -- would give a shit what Cheney thinks. About anything.

I'm so damn tired of seeing this asshole's face on TV, watching the lapdog media run like servile suck-butts over and over again to get Cheney's opinion as to whether the current administration is properly cleaning up the mess he left behind.

Fuck this guy. If you don't have video of his arrogant ass being hauled into the Hague, I don't want to see or hear from him.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Quote of the Day


"Quite honestly, I couldn’t put it down... It was almost like a book I would have written myself."

-- Satan, in the foreword of Dick Cheney's memoir, In My Time (according to Andy Borowitz)

Friday, August 26, 2011

Prattle Royale


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the ultimate political cliché grudge match. In the right corner, it's an aging imperialist goon who believes that indiscriminately killing and torturing people in the name of the almighty American way is entirely justified and who, when it comes to being questioned about his actions, makes Colonel Nathan Jessup look like George McFly.


In the left corner, it's two effete weenies whose self-righteousness is matched only by their bottomless reservoir of indignation and whose signature move involves wonking their opponents into submission.

Who ya got?

The Huffington Post: Chris Hayes and Glenn Greenwald Rip Dick Cheney (And, of Course, Barack Obama)/8.26.11

It's like if Jugdish, Sidney and Clayton suddenly got off the couch and tried to beat Neidermeyer to death with the punch ladle at the Omega house.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Blast from the Past


Remember this guy?

Apparently Dick Cheney doesn't either.

The Washington Post: Since Dick Cheney Shot Him, Harry Whittington's Aim Has Been To Move On/10.14.10

The most astonishing part of story isn't simply the dignity and grace exhibited by Whittington following an incident that almost killed him -- or that the author of the piece even bothered to revisit the incident in the first place; it's how badly the press screwed up five years ago, getting the story almost completely wrong and never really bothering to ask why.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Tuesday Is Recycling Day


Putting a twist on the admittedly crass joke that you should never trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die, it's not a good idea to trust something that's still alive after four five heart-attacks. Alas, Dick Cheney once again suffers pain where his heart should be but will likely come out of the whole thing none the worse for wear. Still, news of his hospitalization caps a two week period that saw him admit on national television that he endorsed war crimes and, not coincidentally, get a standing ovation from the psychopath crowd at CPAC. A few days before Barack Obama's inauguration last year, I wrote a piece expressing support for the idea that the incoming administration might be willing to consider formal charges against members of the Bush White House who wantonly violated the law during their time in office. I stand by it even now, while resigning myself to the fact that it was always a naive thing to hope for.

"Walk of Shame" (Originally Published, 1.15.09)

It's probably a good idea to preface what I'm about to say with a quick fact: I was in New York City two days after September 11th, 2001; I covered the aftermath of the attack that leveled the World Trade Center both from Ground Zero and from the 69th Regiment Armory at 25th and Lexington, which was where many of the families of those missing and presumed dead were sent to have their cases processed. I held in my arms men and women who'd just lost loved ones and who were, at that moment, devastated remnants of the people they had been just a few days earlier. Because of all this, I felt an electrified rush of jingoistic venom like nothing I'd ever experienced before. I wanted to see those responsible for the catastrophic anguish around me not simply brought to justice, but made to suffer in the most excruciating way possible. The people who brought down the World Trade Center -- and part of the Pentagon, and a commercial jet full of innocents in Pennsylvania -- deserved to die, and die horribly. They still do.

I need to make all of these experiences and these feelings clear, because maybe if I do it will help to lend a certain kind of weight to what I think now has to be said.

George W. Bush and members of his administration should be investigated and stand trial for their crimes -- for their trampling of the Constitution, their illegal and unnecessary war, launched under false pretenses, against a country that didn't pose a clear and present danger to the United States and, most egregiously and despicably, their illicit and explicit approval of the torture of enemy prisoners.

Last month, the Senate Armed Services Committee released a report detailing the Bush Administration's fingerprints on a plan, first hatched in 2002, to reverse-engineer the SERE training (Survive, Evade, Resist, Escape) given to some U.S. special forces units. The object of SERE is to teach special-ops personnel how to withstand the kind of interrogation methods they could face if captured by countries or militias that don't honor the Geneva Conventions. It was the creative idea of the White House to have SERE instructors turn around and teach torture techniques to covert interrogation teams involved in the War on Terror.

For years, this underground program remained largely and safely removed from public scrutiny; although it was in fact reported on, the administration engaged in its usual obfuscation and deflection while quietly charging those who dared to ask too many questions with being unpatriotic in a time of war. Over the past couple of weeks, though -- maybe emboldened by knowledge that their time is almost up and that they'll likely never be held accountable for their actions -- the Bush Administration's chief architects of this plan have begun, Colonel Nathan Jessup-style, to admit that they ordered the Code Red and would do it again if given the chance. Dick Cheney in particular confirmed in no uncertain terms that the U.S. tortured al Qaeda prisoners and all but dared potential critics to do anything about it.

He knows he can be as forthcoming -- to say nothing of brash and arrogant -- as he likes right now, because he knows that he's right: His critics in the incoming administration aren't going to do a goddamned thing about any of it. They'll talk tough -- say they're not ruling anything out and that investigating the past transgressions of the Bush clan is always on the table. But when all is said and done -- in other words, next Tuesday -- it will end the same way for Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, et al: They'll live out their lives in expensive homes far from Washington, DC, counting the money they're making from honorary corporate positions and speaking engagements. And they'll sleep very, very well -- with clear consciences.

The problem is that many of the Bush Administration's sins, with special attention paid to the issue of authorized torture, don't qualify as a simple case of a bunch of guys improvising during an unprecedented time in American history -- doing the best they could with what they had. George W. Bush and his cronies broke the law. Willfully. Wantonly. And if we truly adhere to the belief that no one is above the law, then that makes them all criminals.

I'm more than willing to admit that, from a political perspective, any attempt by incoming president Barack Obama to prosecute members of the Bush White House would be a lousy idea, one sure to be met with resentment from many of the leaders he needs to work with and outrage from a portion of the country he needs to help heal. Most Americans who consider the Bush era to be a dark age in our history are content to see its engineers and enablers thrown out on their asses, their lasting legacy one of unmitigated shame. Most people just want to move forward; that's what electing Barack Obama was all about. But if we remove the political question, what we're left with is solely a legal one: Did Bush and company break the law?

Again, they did.

And this country's standing and stature can't be restored simply by swinging a U-turn and looking toward a new kind of future without taking responsibility for the mistakes of the past. We'll never get our respect -- self and otherwise -- back if we just pretend like the last eight years never happened and let the men behind one of our nation's most embarrassing periods quietly walk away from the disastrous mess they made.

We don't torture. That's not who we are -- not what this country is about.

What we're about is bringing the guilty to justice.

Whether it's a foreign terrorist or a U.S. president.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Quote of the Day


" I was a big supporter of waterboarding."

-- Dick Cheney in an interview with ABC's Jonathan Karl that aired yesterday


Not that this will ever go anywhere, but for those not paying attention Cheney essentially just admitted to being a war criminal on national television.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Quote of the Day


"I'm incensed by Cheney's year-long crusade to undermine Obama... I generally don't use words like 'traitor' or 'un-American,' and I was horrified by the way the right has used them to smear and destroy... (But) since no American vice-president, in 233 years, has ever attacked his successor's administration so brutally so quickly, I think it's technically accurate to call Cheney's behavior un-American."

-- Joan Walsh, stating the obvious in Salon

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Quote of the Day


"You know, on the Internet there's an acronym that's used to apply to situations like this. It's called 'STFU.' I don't think I can say that on the air, but I think you know what that means."

-- Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida on Hardball last night, responding to Dick Cheney's accusation that President Obama gave "aid and comfort to the enemy" by taking time to analyze the situation before committing more troops to Afghanistan

I realize it's not even worth pointing out anymore because by now any amount of shameless, bald-faced hypocrisy from the assholes on the right is as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning, but isn't Cheney the exact same guy who spent almost eight years sternly warning that criticizing the president during a time of war was -- wait for it -- "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" (the definition of treason, incidentally)? And more than that, who gives a fuck what Cheney's opinion is on anything? I've said it before but it bears repeating: A) he's a private citizen now, one stripped of all political authority, and B) he belongs up against a wall out behind the Hague wearing a blindfold and being asked if he'd like a cigarette.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Quote of the Day


"I basically don't."

-- Dick Cheney when asked whether he thinks the Bush administration bears any responsibility for the situation in Afghanistan

You know, I'll bet there's a wall right out behind the Hague that would just work perfectly.

(h/t Cesca)

Friday, May 22, 2009

Tricky Dick



Gee, here's a shock.

McClatchy Newspapers: Cheney's Speech Contained Omissions, Exaggerations, Misstatements/5.21.09

A good rule of thumb these days: If it's coming from the right and it sounds like it proves their case, it's probably bullshit.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Quote of the Week


"When they see the American government caught up in arguments about interrogations. The terrorists see just what they were hoping for -- our unity gone, our resolve shaken, our leaders distracted. In short, they see weakness and opportunity."

-- Dick Cheney, as usual partying like it's 2004 (and as if anyone gives a rat's ass what he thinks anymore), in his "rebuttal" speech to President Obama's address at the National Archives yesterday

To read the rest of Cheney's impotent, Captain Queegian ramblings -- and you really have to see this shit to believe it -- click here.

Keep at it, Dick. You're doing the Democratic strategists' jobs for them.

Just remember: 13% approval rating.

Friday, May 15, 2009

The Weakest Link


Andrew Sullivan, Josh Marshall and, as I mentioned earlier this week, Bob Cesca are all grabbing onto the torture-Iraq War nexus story with both hands right now.

And with good reason.

It's rare that I hype a news item, particularly one that would at first glance seem to require a bent toward the conspiracy-minded, but this is one of those things that has to be very seriously looked into. It's no exaggeration to say that if it's true that the Bush-Cheney White House ordered the torture of foreign prisoners specifically to establish a link -- completely unreliable at the time and inevitably faulty -- between 9/11 and Iraq, it would be the largest criminal conspiracy in the history of this country's executive branch.

From Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo:

"More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when we were looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq."

A message to the people in power now: Do not brush this shit under the rug.

Update (from CNN story): "(The torture program's) principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at preempting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al Qaeda."

Those are the words of Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's chief of staff during his tenure as secretary of state.

Seriously, read the story linked directly below and tell me Cheney shouldn't be in handcuffs right now -- or maybe up against a wall out behind the Hague.

CNN: Top Powell Aide Says Torture Helped Build Iraq War Case/5.15.09

Related: True/Slant: Taibblog: Being Anti-Torture Doesn't Make You Pro-Terrorist/5.11.09

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Family Guile


First it was Dick Cheney practically going door-to-door to convince Americans that we didn't torture. And even if we did it saved lives. And we're less safe now that we're debating whether it was or wasn't torture. And "Hey, look at that shiny object over there," -- and so on.

Now his daughter, Liz, has decided to go into the family business, creating an impressively quasi-Spectorian Wall of Bullshit from the Cheney clan on the subject of torture.

The question, though, is -- why?

Cesca thinks he may know the answer, and if he's right, it's a criminal conspiracy that goes a hell of a lot further than just selling out our ideals and values.

The Huffington Post: "The Real Motive Behind the Cheney Family Torture Tour/5.13.09" by Bob Cesca

Quote of the Week (Honorable Mention)


"I wish him well... It's over. But I do hope he gets some more target practice before he goes out again."

-- Bill Clinton taking the easy jab at Dick Cheney but apparently failing to realize that he's really the last person who should joke about shooting someone in the face

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Dick in a Box


You've kinda gotta love Dick Cheney these days; he's pretty much doing the job of federal investigators for them:

"I certainly have every reason to believe that (George W. Bush) knew a great deal about the program. He basically authorized it. I mean, this was a presidential level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed off on it."

That's Cheney talking about the torture -- or as he euphemistically calls it, "enhanced interrogation" -- of foreign detainees during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I swear, every day that passes Cheney mutates a little more from his already ghastly gila monster-like self into a real-life version of Col. Nathan Jessup -- Jack Nicholson's sadistic Marine commander in A Few Good Men. He not only refuses to offer any kind of remorse or acknowledgment that the tactics undertaken by the Bush Administration in regard to prisoners of war may have violated every principle America stands for -- but put a mic in front of him and he'll be happy to casually boast about it.

Bottom line: He just named George W. Bush as having ordered acts that essentially qualify as war crimes -- and he did it on national television.

Why the fuck is the FBI not kicking in both Bush and Cheney's doors right this second?

And why, for that matter, is anyone, on the right or left, continuing to listen to a man who left office with a 13% approval rating at all?

Speaking of which, how about one more bit of sage wisdom from Cheney's appearance this morning on CBS's Face the Nation. When Bob Schieffer asked him who he'd choose to represent the Republican party, Rush Limbaugh or Colin Powell (because Limbaugh, a fat, drug-addicted talk radio host, had the balls to condescend to Powell, an honest-to-God war hero, last week by suggesting that he get out of the GOP and just go become a Democrat), Cheney responded with this:

"If I had to choose in terms of being a Republican, I'd go with Rush Limbaugh, I think. I think my take on it was Colin had already left the party. I didn't know he was still a Republican."

All I can say is: Keep up the good work, Dick. Just like Limbaugh, you're ensuring that the Republican Party will never be more than the party of 13%.

And considering its present incarnation, that's great news.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Walk of Shame


It's probably a good idea to preface what I'm about to say with a quick fact: I was in New York City two days after September 11th, 2001; I covered the aftermath of the attack that leveled the World Trade Center both from ground zero and from the 69th Regiment Armory at 25th and Lexington, which was where many of the families of those missing and presumed dead were sent to have their cases processed. I held in my arms men and women who'd just lost loved ones and who were, at that moment, devastated remnants of the people they had been just a few days earlier. Because of all this, I felt an electrified rush of jingoistic venom like nothing I'd ever experienced before. I wanted to see those responsible for the catastrophic anguish around me not simply brought to justice, but made to suffer in the most excruciating way possible. The people who brought down the World Trade Center -- and part of the Pentagon, and a commercial jet full of innocents in Pennsylvania -- deserved to die, and die horribly. They still do.

I need to make all of these experiences and these feelings clear, because maybe if I do it will help to lend a certain kind of weight to what I think now has to be said.

George W. Bush and members of his administration should be investigated and stand trial for their crimes -- for their trampling of the Constitution, their illegal and unnecessary war, launched under false pretenses, against a country that didn't pose a clear and present danger to the United States and, most egregiously and despicably, their illicit and explicit approval of the torture of enemy prisoners.

Last month, the Senate Armed Services Committee released a report detailing the Bush Administration's fingerprints on a plan, first hatched in 2002, to reverse-engineer the SERE training (Survive, Evade, Resist, Escape) given to some U.S. special forces units. The object of SERE is to teach special-ops personnel how to withstand the kind of interrogation methods they could face if captured by countries or militias that don't honor the Geneva Conventions. It was the creative idea of the White House to have SERE instructors turn around and teach torture techniques to covert interrogation teams involved in the War on Terror.

For years, this underground program remained largely and safely removed from public scrutiny; although it was in fact reported on, the administration engaged in its usual obfuscation and deflection while quietly charging those who dared to ask too many questions with being unpatriotic in a time of war. Over the past couple of weeks, though -- maybe emboldened by knowledge that their time is almost up and that they'll likely never be held accountable for their actions -- the Bush Administration's chief architects of this plan have begun, Colonel Nathan Jessup-style, to admit that they ordered the Code Red and would do it again if given the chance. Dick Cheney in particular confirmed in no uncertain terms that the U.S. tortured al Qaeda prisoners and all but dared potential critics to do anything about it.

He knows he can be as forthcoming -- to say nothing of brash and arrogant -- as he likes right now, because he knows that he's right: His critics in the incoming administration aren't going to do a goddamned thing about any of it. They'll talk tough -- say they're not ruling anything out and that investigating the past transgressions of the Bush clan is always on the table. But when all is said and done -- in other words, next Tuesday -- it will end the same way for Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, et al: They'll live out their lives in expensive homes far from Washington, DC, counting the money they're making from honorary corporate positions and speaking engagements. And they'll sleep very, very well -- with clear consciences.

The problem is that many of the Bush Administration's sins, with special attention paid to the issue of authorized torture, don't qualify as a simple case of a bunch of guys improvising during an unprecedented time in American history -- doing the best they could with what they had. George W. Bush and his cronies broke the law. Willfully. Wantonly. And if we truly adhere to the belief that no one is above the law, then that makes them all criminals.

I'm more than willing to admit that, from a political perspective, any attempt by incoming president Barack Obama to prosecute members of the Bush White House would be a lousy idea, one sure to be met with resentment from many of the leaders he needs to work with and outrage from a portion of the country he needs to help heal. Most Americans who consider the Bush era to be a dark age in our history are content to see its engineers and enablers thrown out on their asses, their lasting legacy one of unmitigated shame. Most people just want to move forward; that's what electing Barack Obama was all about. But if we remove the political question, what we're left with is solely a legal one: Did Bush and company break the law?

Again, they did.

And this country's standing and stature can't be restored simply by swinging a U-turn and looking toward a new kind of future without taking responsibility for the mistakes of the past. We'll never get our respect -- self and otherwise -- back if we just pretend like the last eight years never happened and let the men behind one of our nation's most embarrassing periods quietly walk away from the disastrous mess they made.

We don't torture. That's not who we are -- not what this country is about.

What we're about is bringing the guilty to justice.

Whether it's a foreign terrorist or a U.S. president.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Of War-Mongers and Men


Arianna Huffington latest column takes an interesting look at the relation between an unrepentant Dick Cheney and the character Clint Eastwood plays in his new movie, Gran Torino.

The Huffington Post: "Cheney and Clint: A Tale of Two Dicks" by Arianna Huffington/12.18.08

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Cheney Gang



This will probably go nowhere (I mean, come on -- it's like the Italian vigili urbani trying to slap the cuffs on Mussolini), but I suppose it's worth remembering that Eliot Ness nailed Capone for tax evasion.

Plus, it's just fun to finally see a headline like this in print.

AP: Cheney, Gonzales Indicted in South Texas County/11.18.08

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Quote of the Week


"I'm not surprised. Dick Cheney has been wrong on everything else the last eight years. He's on a roll."

-- Joe Biden, commenting on Dick Cheney's recent endorsement of John McCain