Showing posts with label andrew sullivan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label andrew sullivan. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2012

Quote of the Day


"The fact is, I'm gay. Always have been, always will be, and I couldn’t be any more happy, comfortable with myself, and proud."

-- Anderson Cooper, officially confirming the worst kept secret in television news

He made this statement in an e-mail to Andrew Sullivan, one he allowed Sullivan to reprint publicly. Bottom line: Good for Coop. I always respected his decision to keep his private life private and I respect his decision to come out even more.

More on this a little later in the Daily Banter.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The Uncanny-date


Granted I haven't really been writing as much as I used to, but I still like to think that I'm relatively decent with words -- or at the very least at turning a clever phrase or two when the occasion calls for it. For the life of me, though, I haven't been able to express what it is about Mitt Romney that's so fucking odd. If you listen to me talk about him on the podcast, I'm constantly stammering, looking for the right way to describe the Uncanny Valley-esque revulsion I feel whenever I see and hear him speak and attempt to interact with the world around him -- his creepy and obviously phony facade that hides what truly appears to be a complete lack of human empathy. I'm not saying he's inherently evil or anything, or that there's any sort of willful malice behind his awkward and seemingly sociopathic demeanor; on the contrary, I think he's the least self-aware person who's run for the White House in modern history. Even George W. Bush understood full-well who and what he was; you could see his pathology written all over his face. Romney is a complete mystery, I think -- even to himself.

All of that being said, hats off to Andrew Sullivan, who's come closest to putting into words the undeniable weirdness that is Mitt Romney. I get that some will see his dragging the whole Mormon thing into the mix as a low blow, but I really don't think it is.

From the Daily Beast:

"One gets the sense that Mormons, perhaps because they remain deeply insecure about their religion, make an extra effort to seem utterly great, happy, nice, genial human beings. Hence what’s been called 'The Mormon Mask.' (More discussion of the concept here.)

Romney laughs that way; he also talks as if he’s learned the English language from some tribe of extremely cheerful, mainstream, extremely white Americans from around 1958...

How to overcome the huge gap between what one believes and how the general culture would react if the details of his faith were fully explained? One option: The construction of a personality designed to mimic the least offensive, nicest, all-American persona. So Romney sounds and looks like a focus-group tested model president from 1965. But the focus group doesn’t exist -- except in his own mind and manner every year of his life."


By the way, click the above "Mormon Mask" link and you'll see that I'm not the only person to liken the disconcerting nature of his personality to the Uncanny Valley.

I've never been a huge fan of Star Trek: The Next Generation or any of the movies based on it, but every time I see Romney in a supposedly off-the-cuff moment, this is the first thing I think of:





(via the Daily Banter)

Monday, November 14, 2011

Quote of the Day


"Yes it fucking does. If you see anyone -- even your own father -- raping a ten year old in the showers, the first thing you do is stop it yourself. You don't even call the cops right away. You clock the rapist in the head or drag the boy out of his clutches. I'm so sick of these excuses for the inexcusable. McQueary is as depraved as all the others who stood by and did nothing."

-- Andrew Sullivan on the assertion by some that Mike McQueary's reaction to walking in on Jerry Sandusky as he raped a young boy doesn't seem so strange when you consider that Sandusky was like a relative of his, hence why he ran and told his father about it rather than stopping it cold

I'm probably going to be out of the mix for most of the day, but I think it's hugely important that we don't do the traditional "new week = new news cycle" thing with this story. Besides, the scandal is only going to get worse anyway. Much worse, I'm betting.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Quote of the Day


"I didn't realize I hated these bankers even more than these hippies. But it took the hippies to bring it out in me. I can't help hoping they upset a few of the bastards."

-- Andrew Sullivan, summing my position up just about perfectly

Friday, February 25, 2011

Quote of the Day, Jr.


"There is a difference, however, between radical politics and this kind of a response to a demand to assassinate the first black president of the United States. He needs to resign."

-- Andrew Sullivan on Rep. Paul Broun

A reader of Sullivan's runs down Broun's history of inflammatory, irresponsible and outright lunatic rhetoric over the past couple of years, just in case you needed a refresher on what kind of asshole we're talking about here.

By the way, Broun is now saying that he was "stunned" when he heard the question and that it's an "abhorrent" thing to suggest. So in case you're playing along at home: stunned at abhorrence = laughter. Keep that in mind.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Hot Under the Collar


Via Andrew Sullivan, the most amusing thing you'll see all day: an Amazon page offering host wafers, ostensibly for purchase by priests.

But scroll down after clicking the above link and take a glance at what was also bought buy those customers who frequently pick up the wafers. (Hint: look in the center of the row of items.)

I personally don't see what the big deal is. Both products can be used to give young boys their first "Communion."

Monday, November 23, 2009

Quote of the Day


"His frequent speeches before large crowds all across the country are full of obtuse circular arguments about good and evil, and in interviews and small gatherings, like ones he has held for academics and journalists when he visits the United Nations in New York, he answers questions with questions, ending with a joyous smile that reads as a distinct putdown. His logic is seldom convincing, but then he cares little about what elites and experts think of him. He knows that the poor masses like his folksy style. Though he may seem comical, to many in Iran he comes across as daring and confident. They like his audacity, and especially the way he stands up to the elites, belittling their education, their wealth and their blue blood."

-- Iranian scholar Vali Nasr, on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

This was posted over at Andrew Sullivan's blog and, as he states so perfectly, proves that fundamentalist politics -- whether Middle Eastern Muslim or American Christian -- must always be confronted with the relentless application of logic and reason.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The Old Man and the C-Word


Kudos to Andrew Sullivan for keeping his eye on the ball during this week of non-stop Palin media ubiquity. He's placing the blame for our ongoing national nightmare squarely where it belongs: on John McCain.

Remember that if it weren't for McCain and his team's thoroughly cynical, irresponsible and, yeah, dangerous decision to open Pandora's Box (for those who've long since forgotten this or have simply psychologically repressed it, Sarah Palin was at one point frighteningly close to being one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the highest office in the world) none of us would even be familiar with the Palin Reality Show, let alone be subjected to its lunacy everywhere we fucking turn.

From Sullivan's column in the Atlantic yesterday:

"We knew that about a charlatan like Kristol and a nihilist like Rove. But what I didn't fully come to terms with, until the Palin farce, was the full extent of John McCain's recklessness and cynicism. This is worth keeping in mind through all this. The only reason we even know about Sarah Palin is John McCain.

He picked her so carelessly, and his thought process was so cynical, that he should stand in the dock of public opinion before Palin does. Her vanity led her to say yes to his crazy offer. But he gave her that chance. And in the end, she is his responsibility.

And that's why in fact the pushback has been almost milquetoast. How do Steve Schmidt and John McCain reveal the truth about Palin when that truth only further proves their fantastic incompetence, nihilism and unseriousness with respect to government? And what's truly telling about Washington is that a man like McCain, who perpetrated this nonsense and even now refuses to take an ounce of responsibility for it, is nonetheless invited on countless talk shows and treated like the hero he always was. And no one demands he account for this train-wreck outside his tested cant about Palin 'exciting the base.'

If he had any sense of responsibility, he would resign. And if the Washington media had any sense of responsibility, it would never invite him on TV again without demanding he take responsibility for what he nearly did to the national security of this country. No one who put this person near the nuclear button should have a future in public life."


As much as it pains me to mention Sarah Palin here yet again -- for the record, I searched the name "Palin" in the DXM archives and 188 entries came up -- I wanted to bring back one of the very first things I wrote in the wake of John McCain's introduction of what we know now is, to quote a very old Saturday Night Live sketch, "The Thing That Wouldn't Leave." At the time I was furious as hell about Palin; I still am, just for different reasons.

"McCain and Unable" (Originally Published, 8.29.09)

I should be glad John McCain picked Sarah Palin to be his running-mate.

I should be glad that in his first true test of leadership -- the one that inescapably sets the tone for what's to come and acts as a yardstick by which to measure his judgment -- he proved that he isn't fit to govern an Elks Lodge, much less the United States of America.

I should be glad that by choosing a self-proclaimed "hockey mom" -- a first-term governor of a state with an unimaginably low population density whose only former role in public service was as a city councilwoman and the mayor of a town of 8,000; a former beauty queen with no experience whatsoever in foreign affairs -- John McCain may have all but handed the election to Barack Obama.

I should be glad.

So why the hell am I so outraged?

Maybe it's because what John McCain just did -- the cynical gamble he's taken in a desperate effort to win the White House -- in fact gambles with the very future of this country. With the safety of its citizens and the lives of its soldiers. By attempting to pander to those Hillary Clinton supporters who may still feel snubbed and disillusioned by the outcome of the Democratic race, and by making a transparent grab for both the shock value that can only come from pure political theater and the chance to regain his "maverick" label, McCain has said something terrifying -- and telling.

He's said that he's perfectly willing to risk the United States -- a country that, as he's so fond of reminding us, has enemies that must be confronted; a country that's currently enmeshed in two wars -- to achieve his goal of getting elected.

Because don't think for a second that he truly believes Sarah Palin is ready to lead the free world should something render him unable to. No, what John McCain believes is that Sarah Palin can lead enough women to the polls to win him the presidency.

It's a thought that should make Americans sick to their stomachs: McCain is counting on Palin's charm and warmth, her somewhat sharp mind [Author's Note: How funny is that line now? I stand very, very corrected.] and fascinating backstory, to mesmerize voters and recast his campaign and his image in a bright new sheen of youth and vitality. He expects Sarah Palin to be the spark plug that fires up the media, who will surely have to admit that he's turning his back on the past and is ready to reshape and reclaim the Republican Party by making history. And yet at the end of the day, nothing changes the fact that this is actually more of the same from the GOP -- more political opportunism and clever gamesmanship for the sake of achieving the goal of power. Nor does anything change the fact that McCain wants to put someone without a shred of experience in foreign relations, worldwide diplomacy or global conflicts a heartbeat away from having to deal with all three -- with the security of the rest of us hanging in the balance.

As McCain himself has implied about his opponent, the White House is not the place for on-the-job training -- not during these uncertain times, when our country is facing turmoil abroad and unprecedented challenges at home.

Why am I outraged?

Because there's always the possibility that his shifty little parlor trick will actually work.

And then what?

Monday, January 19, 2009

Quote(s) of the Week (Early Contender)


CH: “I want tongue. Give me tongue."

AS: “No, I'm not giving you tongue.”

CH: “Let the record show: Sullivan wouldn't give tongue.”

AS: “He's gayer than I am!” (to a third party)


-- Conversation between Christopher Hitchens and Andrew Sullivan while the two were stuck in an elevator together at Slate.com's pre-inauguration party in Washington, DC